Governance Automation

Incident & Complaint Automation

When an incident or complaint is logged, INTENTIQ does the governance work automatically — creating clinical notes, updating your risk register, flagging Duty of Candour and CQC-notifiable cases, and tracking every corrective action. Nothing falls through the cracks.

Book a Demo

Governance that runs itself

Most systems just store an incident or complaint. INTENTIQ acts on it — screening for risk at intake, escalating what matters, notifying the right people, and mapping each case to the relevant CQC regulation. Two automated pathways, one Governance Alert Board.

Pathway 1

Incident Automation & Flagging

Trigger: A clinical or operational incident is logged in the system.

📝

Auto-creates a Clinical Note

If a patient was affected, a clinical note is added to their record — incident date, type, objective facts, clinical impact, care provided, monitoring/follow-up and Duty of Candour status. The incident report links back to the note.

⚠️

Auto-updates the Risk Register

When harm reaches moderate, severe or death level, a clinical safety risk entry is created at the correct level (medium / high / critical), with the identified date, immediate actions as current controls and a 30-day review date.

📧

Auto-notifies admins & managers

In-app notifications and branded email when the incident triggers Duty of Candour or a CQC statutory notification — including type, date, severity and a direct link to the incident.

🗺️

Surfaces on the Governance Alert Board

Incidents that trigger Duty of Candour or are CQC-notifiable are flagged on the dashboard with their status (case opened / action required / pending notification), mapped to the relevant regulation (Reg 18, Reg 20).

🔄

Learning loop tracking

Corrective actions from incidents are tracked automatically (completed / pending / overdue) and surfaced — so nothing falls through the cracks.

Pathway 2

Complaint Automation & Flagging

Trigger: A business complaint is logged (from client, staff, parent, advocate or external body).

🔍

Mandatory escalation screening

The form itself forces screening at intake for safeguarding concerns, incident criteria, risk register criteria, data protection involvement and CQC notifiability — so nothing is missed at registration.

🔴

Immediate risk flagging

If ongoing risk is detected, a red escalation banner appears and the complaint is flagged for immediate Clinical Lead escalation.

🗺️

Auto-flags on the Governance Alert Board

CQC-notifiable complaints (yes / under review) → Reg 18. Critical complaints (Grade 3 or 4) → flagged separately. Duty of Candour threshold cases (incident criteria + serious harm) → Reg 20, checking whether a DoC case is open.

⏱️

RAG response-time guidance

Built into the status pathway so handling timeframes are enforced by design — Green ≤10 days, Amber ≤5 days, Red ≤24h, Black same-day.

24-hour acknowledgement tracking

Once acknowledgement is marked as sent, the system tracks the 24-hour deadline to complete and send the actual acknowledgement.

🔄

CAPA capture at closure

Corrective & Preventive Actions — lessons learned, policy/SOP updates and training requirements — are captured at closure, feeding back into the governance loop.

One Governance Alert Board

Both pathways feed a single dashboard that surfaces every critical routing item across incidents, complaints and Duty of Candour cases — mapped to CQC regulations — so leadership always knows what needs action and what’s been missed.

See it in a demo

Run the clinic. See the risk. Evidence the quality.

0333 043 2226 · info@intentiq.co.uk · intentiq.co.uk